<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Merrywives' Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://merrywives.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://merrywives.org</link>
	<description>Trashing Silly Stereotypes Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat Tax in Alabama by kwnwxbzwgia</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2008/08/27/fat-tax-in-alabama/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kwnwxbzwgia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LPy4k3  &lt;a href=&quot;http://pnybrkyuvkot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pnybrkyuvkot&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LPy4k3  <a href="http://pnybrkyuvkot.com/" rel="nofollow">pnybrkyuvkot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat Tax in Alabama by wwxffzjt</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2008/08/27/fat-tax-in-alabama/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wwxffzjt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UNeykJ  &lt;a href=&quot;http://lgwducwjvgrl.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lgwducwjvgrl&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNeykJ  <a href="http://lgwducwjvgrl.com/" rel="nofollow">lgwducwjvgrl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat Tax in Alabama by Melia</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2008/08/27/fat-tax-in-alabama/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, that\&#039;ll do it. You have my apprecaition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that\&#8217;ll do it. You have my apprecaition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mission Statement by Linboys@aol.com</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/about/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linboys@aol.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am interested in being in a pleural marriage but am older (51).  Are there any options for me?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in being in a pleural marriage but am older (51).  Are there any options for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Feminist Studies Mormon Polygamy And, Remarkably, Finds That It Liberated the Wives by J.X. Pershing</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2011/08/02/a-feminist-studies-mormon-polygamy-and-remarkably-finds-that-it-liberated-the-wives/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.X. Pershing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.org/?p=621#comment-788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe in polygamy, but I am finding it very difficult to find ONE good woman, let alone 2 or 3 !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in polygamy, but I am finding it very difficult to find ONE good woman, let alone 2 or 3 !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mission Statement by laura</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/about/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

Heard about your community from TV of all places.  I am not an avid watcher but do watch &quot;Our America,&#039; once in a while and your community was the topic tonight.  I was very impressed with the frank courage of all those who were interviewed and touched with the genuine caring each person seemed to have for the community at large.

Although I do not think I would want to engage in polygamy any more than I would any other alternative lifestyle I cannot see why it is condemned.  I ask myself again and again, &#039;who is harmed?&#039;  Why must we all fit into neat social boxes when we claim we are a free country?  It smacks of discrimination and repression to me, defining &#039;marriage&#039; as being solely between one man and one woman and dragging the bible, which some Americans do NOT believe is the word of God, is not what a separation of church and state - unless I am ignorant and fail to understand the difference between the two.  Could be I guess I&#039;m not as bright as I think, but I believe meddling in how people choose to marry, and whom they choose to marry should be left up to them as long as the individuals involved are competent to make such a commitment.

I think that those who shriek against polygamy do so out of ignorance, pathology, fear and perhaps jealously.  I hope that more  people saw the program and were educated or moved as I was.  Thank you for allowing me to visit your community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Heard about your community from TV of all places.  I am not an avid watcher but do watch &#8220;Our America,&#8217; once in a while and your community was the topic tonight.  I was very impressed with the frank courage of all those who were interviewed and touched with the genuine caring each person seemed to have for the community at large.</p>
<p>Although I do not think I would want to engage in polygamy any more than I would any other alternative lifestyle I cannot see why it is condemned.  I ask myself again and again, &#8216;who is harmed?&#8217;  Why must we all fit into neat social boxes when we claim we are a free country?  It smacks of discrimination and repression to me, defining &#8216;marriage&#8217; as being solely between one man and one woman and dragging the bible, which some Americans do NOT believe is the word of God, is not what a separation of church and state &#8211; unless I am ignorant and fail to understand the difference between the two.  Could be I guess I&#8217;m not as bright as I think, but I believe meddling in how people choose to marry, and whom they choose to marry should be left up to them as long as the individuals involved are competent to make such a commitment.</p>
<p>I think that those who shriek against polygamy do so out of ignorance, pathology, fear and perhaps jealously.  I hope that more  people saw the program and were educated or moved as I was.  Thank you for allowing me to visit your community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plural Marriage: Living Life More Abundantly by sharon</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2010/10/19/plural-marriage-living-life-more-abundantly/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.org/?p=508#comment-767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i dont live my life this way but i understand why you do..i think if you are happy doing it then no one should judge you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont live my life this way but i understand why you do..i think if you are happy doing it then no one should judge you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The paradox of polygamy II: Why most women benefit from polygamy and most men benefit from monogamy by Stoile</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2011/08/02/the-paradox-of-polygamy-ii-why-most-women-benefit-from-polygamy-and-most-men-benefit-from-monogamy/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.org/?p=619#comment-765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, your premise concerning what constitutes the benefits of a  polygynous society over a mongonous one are entirely false. Even when looks at the birth rate of male to females of any society in any country in the world, it is always a uniform 1 to 4. In other words, 80% of any national population will consist entirely of women. These statistics are not only prevalent in every nation on Earth, but the United Nations also confirms its validity. Therefore, it has and could never be possible for a polygynous society to have those men who have wives and those who do not, simply because birth rate statistics 

This fact does not deny that the natural distribution of males and females will be consistent, so that we have cities around the world where there are more men than women for instance. This unnatural  distribution of the sexes is also easily seen in dating sites, where men dominate most dating sites from 4 to 1 to as high as 20 to 1. This only informs us that men see and use dating techniques far differently than what women do, who do not want to be seen as being desperate or as commodities in any society.

Now, we know that any inbalances in the male and female birth rate in any nation are purely due to social and cultural engineering, whereby there is a preference for couples to sire male children only.

Almost the entire history of man is polygynous. Monogamy is a relatively new social pratice going back 1,600 years, but only in western European societies. The majority of the world is still polygynous and the United Nations still confirms this. Outside of Europe, polygamy is still practiced by Christians - not only by Mormans - in North America, Africa and Asia.

Also, it should be in our minds that the practice of polygyny has never distorted or created social inbalances.When we look at every country which practices monogamy, whether it is West or Eastern Europe, it is observed that all national societies cannot maintain their populations, so that they are looking for ways to address &quot;enforced&quot; mongamous imbalances by bringing in migrants from foreign countries.

Secondly, anyone who thinks that monogamy is Christian concept is wholly deluded, because all Christian societies for the first 400 years in the ancient world were polygamous. That was until after Constantine died, when the Gnostics brought laws into place which decimated Christian polygamy. Monogamy is the product of Gnostism and not Christianity.























r]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, your premise concerning what constitutes the benefits of a  polygynous society over a mongonous one are entirely false. Even when looks at the birth rate of male to females of any society in any country in the world, it is always a uniform 1 to 4. In other words, 80% of any national population will consist entirely of women. These statistics are not only prevalent in every nation on Earth, but the United Nations also confirms its validity. Therefore, it has and could never be possible for a polygynous society to have those men who have wives and those who do not, simply because birth rate statistics </p>
<p>This fact does not deny that the natural distribution of males and females will be consistent, so that we have cities around the world where there are more men than women for instance. This unnatural  distribution of the sexes is also easily seen in dating sites, where men dominate most dating sites from 4 to 1 to as high as 20 to 1. This only informs us that men see and use dating techniques far differently than what women do, who do not want to be seen as being desperate or as commodities in any society.</p>
<p>Now, we know that any inbalances in the male and female birth rate in any nation are purely due to social and cultural engineering, whereby there is a preference for couples to sire male children only.</p>
<p>Almost the entire history of man is polygynous. Monogamy is a relatively new social pratice going back 1,600 years, but only in western European societies. The majority of the world is still polygynous and the United Nations still confirms this. Outside of Europe, polygamy is still practiced by Christians &#8211; not only by Mormans &#8211; in North America, Africa and Asia.</p>
<p>Also, it should be in our minds that the practice of polygyny has never distorted or created social inbalances.When we look at every country which practices monogamy, whether it is West or Eastern Europe, it is observed that all national societies cannot maintain their populations, so that they are looking for ways to address &#8220;enforced&#8221; mongamous imbalances by bringing in migrants from foreign countries.</p>
<p>Secondly, anyone who thinks that monogamy is Christian concept is wholly deluded, because all Christian societies for the first 400 years in the ancient world were polygamous. That was until after Constantine died, when the Gnostics brought laws into place which decimated Christian polygamy. Monogamy is the product of Gnostism and not Christianity.</p>
<p>r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The paradox of polygamy I: Why most Americans are polygamous by Will</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2011/08/02/the-paradox-of-polygamy-i-why-most-americans-are-polygamous/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.org/?p=616#comment-741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom line from my research and personal interviews of dozens marriages, singles, men, and women around the world is that MOST women in general do NOT desire sex as much as men and can live without it whereas it is an instinctual incredible drive for MOST men. Most women want to keep the man for themselves and expect him to remain satisfied with a fraction of the sexual need met. Having a 2nd or even 3rd wife would allow the man&#039;s sexual appetite to be satisfied and not leaving him hungry and going outside of his marriage for sex. It is a shame that society has raised the average marriage age to past a woman&#039;s peak and then limited her as the only source of satisfaction for a man. The result: unfaithfulness, teen pregnancies out of wedlock, abortions, bastard children, divorce, and more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line from my research and personal interviews of dozens marriages, singles, men, and women around the world is that MOST women in general do NOT desire sex as much as men and can live without it whereas it is an instinctual incredible drive for MOST men. Most women want to keep the man for themselves and expect him to remain satisfied with a fraction of the sexual need met. Having a 2nd or even 3rd wife would allow the man&#8217;s sexual appetite to be satisfied and not leaving him hungry and going outside of his marriage for sex. It is a shame that society has raised the average marriage age to past a woman&#8217;s peak and then limited her as the only source of satisfaction for a man. The result: unfaithfulness, teen pregnancies out of wedlock, abortions, bastard children, divorce, and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mormon Plural Marriage &#8211; 5 Part Series by El Guapo</title>
		<link>http://merrywives.org/2010/08/30/mormon-plural-marriage-5-part-series/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Guapo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merrywives.org/?p=455#comment-740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website that was hosting this information (www.truthwillprevail.org) is down. This site is not affiliated with us in any way so we can&#039;t provide any further information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website that was hosting this information (www.truthwillprevail.org) is down. This site is not affiliated with us in any way so we can&#8217;t provide any further information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

