Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

A member of CPAC asked me to post this article from the Eagle Forum.

America’s First Official Thanksgiving: A Christian Celebration

The first official Thanksgiving in the United States of America came very soon after the launching of the new nation. President George Washington, upon Congressional request, issued the following Proclamation which all American patriots today should read for its spiritual encouragement and insight. Additionally, The Proclamation can be studied as a revelation of the Judeo-Christian nature of the new nation’s foundations. Accordingly, we offer first a summary of the primary principles of the Judeo-Christian philosophy of law (“jurisprudence”) and then reprint the text of Washington’s Proclamation. We trust that comparing the two will add to the spiritual encouragement and insight you receive at a time when darkness is indeed engulfing our nation as never before.

The Judeo-Christian System of Law: A Summary

  1. The ultimate reality in the universe is the infinite (omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, omnibeneficient, triune, immutable) yet personal (rational, volitional, emotional, relational, creative) God who is the Sovereign of the universe.
  2. As Sovereign, God created the universe and man. He also created, and enforces, a body of Higher Law that human beings are obligated to observe and obey. Man’s disobedience will be judged and punished by the Sovereign God.
  3. God’s Higher Law consists of absolute truths and norms. This Law is expressed in both natural law (nature and the hearts of men) and revealed law (the Bible). Revealed law is a more objective, perfect, and complete expression of God’s Law than natural law.
  4. The heart of God’s law is expressed in the Ten Commandments. Both the First and Second Tables of the Commandments embody both specific norms as well as general principles applicable to all of society and to be enforced by civil law.
  5. God created man in His image, sinless (a creature of dignity and value) yet finite (limited and contingent, incapable of functioning without help outside of himself). But man chose to disobey God (“sin”) and consequently became a creature of depravity (incapable of saving himself from His sinful nature and conduct). Because of both God’s nature and man’s nature, God established civil law as one among several coordinated societal institutions to both restrain man and to help him.
  6. The primary purposes of the institution of civil law are to maintain peace and order, punish wrongdoing, and promote right doing throughout society for the common good.

George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation, 1789

“Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both House of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness;

Now therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been able to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted for the civil religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

And also, that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations, especially such as have shown kindness to us, and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.”

Eagle Forum’s Court Watch Most Fervently Prays for You and Your Loved Ones a Blessed and Joyful Thanksgiving 2009!!!

Read Full Post »

I recently received the following in an email. It is such an encouraging story that reflects the value of holding onto principle and allowing those around us to have their space, which we all need at some point. 😉

August 2, 2009
Modern Love

Those Aren’t Fighting Words, Dear
By LAURA A. MUNSON

LET’S say you have what you believe to be a healthy marriage. You’re still friends and lovers after spending more than half of your lives together. The dreams you set out to achieve in your 20s — gazing into each other’s eyes in candlelit city bistros when you were single and skinny — have for the most part come true.

Two decades later you have the 20 acres of land, the farmhouse, the children, the dogs and horses. You’re the parents you said you would be, full of love and guidance. You’ve done it all: Disneyland, camping, Hawaii, Mexico, city living, stargazing.

Sure, you have your marital issues, but on the whole you feel so self-satisfied about how things have worked out that you would never, in your wildest nightmares, think you would hear these words from your husband one fine summer day: “I don’t love you anymore. I’m not sure I ever did. I’m moving out. The kids will understand. They’ll want me to be happy.”

But wait. This isn’t the divorce story you think it is. Neither is it a begging-him-to-stay story. It’s a story about hearing your husband say “I don’t love you anymore” and deciding not to believe him. And what can happen as a result.

Here’s a visual: Child throws a temper tantrum. Tries to hit his mother. But the mother doesn’t hit back, lecture or punish. Instead, she ducks. Then she tries to go about her business as if the tantrum isn’t happening. She doesn’t “reward” the tantrum. She simply doesn’t take the tantrum personally because, after all, it’s not about her.

Let me be clear: I’m not saying my husband was throwing a child’s tantrum. No. He was in the grip of something else — a profound and far more troubling meltdown that comes not in childhood but in midlife, when we perceive that our personal trajectory is no longer arcing reliably upward as it once did. But I decided to respond the same way I’d responded to my children’s tantrums. And I kept responding to it that way. For four months.

“I don’t love you anymore. I’m not sure I ever did.”

His words came at me like a speeding fist, like a sucker punch, yet somehow in that moment I was able to duck. And once I recovered and composed myself, I managed to say, “I don’t buy it.” Because I didn’t.

He drew back in surprise. Apparently he’d expected me to burst into tears, to rage at him, to threaten him with a custody battle. Or beg him to change his mind.

So he turned mean. “I don’t like what you’ve become.”

Gut-wrenching pause. How could he say such a thing? That’s when I really wanted to fight. To rage. To cry. But I didn’t.

Instead, a shroud of calm enveloped me, and I repeated those words: “I don’t buy it.”

You see, I’d recently committed to a non-negotiable understanding with myself. I’d committed to “The End of Suffering.” I’d finally managed to exile the voices in my head that told me my personal happiness was only as good as my outward success, rooted in things that were often outside my control. I’d seen the insanity of that equation and decided to take responsibility for my own happiness. And I mean all of it.

My husband hadn’t yet come to this understanding with himself. He had enjoyed many years of hard work, and its rewards had supported our family of four all along. But his new endeavor hadn’t been going so well, and his ability to be the breadwinner was in rapid decline. He’d been miserable about this, felt useless, was losing himself emotionally and letting himself go physically. And now he wanted out of our marriage; to be done with our family.

But I wasn’t buying it.

I said: “It’s not age-appropriate to expect children to be concerned with their parents’ happiness. Not unless you want to create co-dependents who’ll spend their lives in bad relationships and therapy. There are times in every relationship when the parties involved need a break. What can we do to give you the distance you need, without hurting the family?”

“Huh?” he said.

“Go trekking in Nepal. Build a yurt in the back meadow. Turn the garage studio into a man-cave. Get that drum set you’ve always wanted. Anything but hurting the children and me with a reckless move like the one you’re talking about.”

Then I repeated my line, “What can we do to give you the distance you need, without hurting the family?”

“Huh?”

“How can we have a responsible distance?”

“I don’t want distance,” he said. “I want to move out.”

My mind raced. Was it another woman? Drugs? Unconscionable secrets? But I stopped myself. I would not suffer.

Instead, I went to my desk, Googled “responsible separation” and came up with a list. It included things like: Who’s allowed to use what credit cards? Who are the children allowed to see you with in town? Who’s allowed keys to what?

I looked through the list and passed it on to him.

His response: “Keys? We don’t even have keys to our house.”

I remained stoic. I could see pain in his eyes. Pain I recognized.

“Oh, I see what you’re doing,” he said. “You’re going to make me go into therapy. You’re not going to let me move out. You’re going to use the kids against me.”

“I never said that. I just asked: What can we do to give you the distance you need … ”

“Stop saying that!”

Well, he didn’t move out.

Instead, he spent the summer being unreliable. He stopped coming home at his usual six o’clock. He would stay out late and not call. He blew off our entire Fourth of July — the parade, the barbecue, the fireworks — to go to someone else’s party. When he was at home, he was distant. He wouldn’t look me in the eye. He didn’t even wish me “Happy Birthday.”

But I didn’t play into it. I walked my line. I told the kids: “Daddy’s having a hard time as adults often do. But we’re a family, no matter what.” I was not going to suffer. And neither were they.

MY trusted friends were irate on my behalf. “How can you just stand by and accept this behavior? Kick him out! Get a lawyer!”

I walked my line with them, too. This man was hurting, yet his problem wasn’t mine to solve. In fact, I needed to get out of his way so he could solve it.

I know what you’re thinking: I’m a pushover. I’m weak and scared and would put up with anything to keep the family together. I’m probably one of those women who would endure physical abuse. But I can assure you, I’m not. I load 1,500-pound horses into trailers and gallop through the high country of Montana all summer. I went through Pitocin-induced natural childbirth. And a Caesarean section without follow-up drugs. I am handy with a chain saw.

I simply had come to understand that I was not at the root of my husband’s problem. He was. If he could turn his problem into a marital fight, he could make it about us. I needed to get out of the way so that wouldn’t happen.

Privately, I decided to give him time. Six months.

I had good days, and I had bad days. On the good days, I took the high road. I ignored his lashing out, his merciless jabs. On bad days, I would fester in the August sun while the kids ran through sprinklers, raging at him in my mind. But I never wavered. Although it may sound ridiculous to say “Don’t take it personally” when your husband tells you he no longer loves you, sometimes that’s exactly what you have to do.

Instead of issuing ultimatums, yelling, crying or begging, I presented him with options. I created a summer of fun for our family and welcomed him to share in it, or not — it was up to him. If he chose not to come along, we would miss him, but we would be just fine, thank you very much. And we were.

And, yeah, you can bet I wanted to sit him down and persuade him to stay. To love me. To fight for what we’ve created. You can bet I wanted to.

But I didn’t.

I barbecued. Made lemonade. Set the table for four. Loved him from afar.

And one day, there he was, home from work early, mowing the lawn. A man doesn’t mow his lawn if he’s going to leave it. Not this man. Then he fixed a door that had been broken for eight years. He made a comment about our front porch needing paint. Our front porch. He mentioned needing wood for next winter. The future. Little by little, he started talking about the future.

It was Thanksgiving dinner that sealed it. My husband bowed his head humbly and said, “I’m thankful for my family.”

He was back.

And I saw what had been missing: pride. He’d lost pride in himself. Maybe that’s what happens when our egos take a hit in midlife and we realize we’re not as young and golden anymore.

When life’s knocked us around. And our childhood myths reveal themselves to be just that. The truth feels like the biggest sucker-punch of them all: it’s not a spouse or land or a job or money that brings us happiness. Those achievements, those relationships, can enhance our happiness, yes, but happiness has to start from within. Relying on any other equation can be lethal.

My husband had become lost in the myth. But he found his way out. We’ve since had the hard conversations. In fact, he encouraged me to write about our ordeal. To help other couples who arrive at this juncture in life. People who feel scared and stuck. Who believe their temporary feelings are permanent. Who see an easy out, and think they can escape.

My husband tried to strike a deal. Blame me for his pain. Unload his feelings of personal disgrace onto me.

But I ducked. And I waited. And it worked.

Laura A. Munson is a writer who lives in Whitefish, Mont.

Read Full Post »

To Brighten Your Day

Froggies

One of our members received this link in a email and thought it would help brighten everyone’s day!! It sure did mine. 😀

Read Full Post »

A Marriage of Fear and Xenophobia

This article was given to us by a friend and was orginally published in a Canadian newspaper – although I don’t know which one.

Read Full Post »

It’s Time the West Emerge from the Closet and Legalize Polygamy” is an article published on the SomaliUK.com website whose opening paragraphs describe fairly well the way I feel about the way people view polygamy.  It seems like most of the time as long as a married man is engaging in a relationship with another woman who is not his wife (a.k.a. his mistress) people turn a blind eye, or think he is a real man’s man for being able to have more than one woman.  On the other hand however, if a man wants to truly love, respect, take care of, and raise the children of more than one woman he is reviled and hated.  This is something I have never been able to understand.

Adultery is O.K. but plural marriage is not.  How does that makes sense?

You may want to read the article.  It is talking about Muslim vs The West and it is very interesting.

Read Full Post »

John Quinones has proven himself to be very antagonistic toward polygamy.  He likes to sensationalize the lifestyle and try to lump us all together as criminals.

Mark Henkel the founder of TruthBearer.org has put together a very interesting article detailing the so called reporting style of Quinones, his lack of objectivity, and his willingness to deceive others.

Following are some excerpts from the article:

John Quiñones deliberately lies to normal people in their everyday lives.   To dupe such unsuspecting real-life people, the show [“What Would YOU Do?”] hires actors and actresses, writes a script, and intentionally sets up completely fake scenarios.   Each made-up story is then used as a soapbox for Quiñones to portray himself as the would-be “moralist” judging the same real-life people to whom he and the show had lied in contriving each set-up scenario.

On past news magazine shows such as ABC’s “PrimeTime,” Quiñones had often “reported” about “polygamists.”   But he exclusively targeted his focus on one single Mormon sect, the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints (FLDS), where real crimes were involved.   The FLDS share roughly 99.9% in commonality with “mainstream” Mormons (LDS), even though the LDS try to deny the FLDS are “even Mormon.”   But having so much more in common with Mormons than with consenting adult pro-polygamists around the country, the FLDS are, in reality, a Mormon sect more than anything else.   Yet, Quiñones always identified the Mormon sect, FLDS, as “the polygamists” or “the polygamist sect.”

In the subsequent years, Quiñones performed even more “polygamy reports” for ABC.   In every case, he slandered all of “the polygamists” by using the same one example of the subdivided Mormons.   He never presented the real facts about the national movement, and he never mentioned other forms of polygamy – ranging from Christian polygamy to secular polygamy to any other form of consenting adult polygamy.   Unfortunately, Quiñones really has proven his willingness to lie to make his money and fame when “reporting” anything about polygamy. 

Mark Henkel goes into detail about the show “What Would YOU do?”, John Quinones’ lack of expertise on polygamy, and also Elissa Wall’s lack of expertise on polygamy.  It is an interesting article.

Read Full Post »

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_11151774

Read Full Post »

Well, I have mixed feelings about the effectiveness of the media training we had in St. George.

Some guidelines we came up with during the meeting for the media are:
Reduce sensationalism – be careful of verbage that colors a story.
Be factual and well balanced.
Differentiate between criminals and the rest of the people.
Don’t ask about sexual abuse when you are interviewing a child.

Some tips the media had for us are:
Step forward and tell your story.
Develop a relationship with reporters.
“It is hard for us to demonize you if you talk to us.” – Ben Winslow
“No comment is a comment.” – Ben Winslow

Unfortuately a lot of the Q & A turned into a pro vs. anti argument about polygamy.

What do you think?

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Heads up:

The Utah & Arizona Safety Net Committee is holding their (our) annual shindig in St. George. May 8, 2008 at the Dixie Center.

We see this as a good opportunity to meet with government agents – especially the AGs Office – and work on current issues.

Want your voice heard? Don’t sleep in. We need you there.

Here is more information.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts